Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Green Bay Packers NFL All-Rookie Team selections/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Hey man im josh via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of Green Bay Packers NFL All-Rookie Team selections (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:25, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Another in my list of Packers' players lists. As always, happy to address any comments or concerns. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:25, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]- "made up of the best rookies" - link rookie
- "Johnnie Gray became the Packers first selection" => "Johnnie Gray became the Packers' first selection"
- That's it I think! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- ChrisTheDude, got them both. Thanks! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:21, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by Alavense
[edit]I didn't see anything wrong. I was just wondering if references 9-14 and 15, 10, 16 and 17, those two groups, could be bundled into single footnotes. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 05:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Alavense, I have no issues implementing it, although I am having trouble technically on how to accomplish it. Do you have an example page you can point to that has this implemented? My main challenge is that the sources you are noting are using reference tags already, so I would be wrapping reference tags inside reference tags. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I've tried to do it myself as well and I didn't manage to do it because of what you say. In any case, it was no more than a suggestion, nothing relevant. So I'll support. Nice work, as always. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 14:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey man im josh
[edit]Source review: Passed
- Reliable enough for the information being cited
- Consistent date formatting
- Consistent and proper reference formatting
- Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
- Spot checks on 15 sources match what they are being cited for
Feedback:
- James Lofton's row is 1978–1986, but you used two digit years for the second year in all of the rows (except when crossing between centuries)
- Randall Cobb's row has the same issue with 2011–2018
- Might be a good idea to put a line break in the header for alignment since that column is looking a little wide and you already have two columns that start a new line
- The names in the 2006, 2009, and 2014 rows aren't alphabetical by last name like the other years with multiple entries
That's all I've got, good stuff Gonzo. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey man im josh, all fixed. Thanks for the review! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.