Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ty the Tasmanian Tiger Zoetrope

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Australian Centre for the Moving Image. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:22, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ty the Tasmanian Tiger Zoetrope

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient reliable sources (found in WP:BEFORE or otherwise) to pass GNG. The only source that covers it in some depth is primary (blog post by the commissioning institute). TheSandDoctor (talk) 15:50, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 16:00, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Australian Centre for the Moving Image, where it is located. It's a neat piece of artwork, but I don't see the coverage to meet WP:GNG. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:08, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect As above - to Australian Centre for the Moving Image Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:01, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Power~enwiki:@Deathlibrarian: I am not sure if there is enough of a mention in Australian Centre for the Moving Image though. The sole mention is a WikiLink to Ty the Tasmanian Tiger Zoetrope and none of the others mentioned in the section have articles (or are redirects). --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 04:23, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.