Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Power of Your Love

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I'm taking Walter Görlitz's last comment as meaning that he no longer advocates deletion. If I'm wrong, I'm sure to hear about it. Deor (talk) 14:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Power of Your Love

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Does not meet Does not meet WP:NALBUMS. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable album fails WP:NALBUMS. No significant coverage found in reliable sources. Philg88 ^♦talk 04:29, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment On 19 June 2014 the nominator PRODed some 50+ Hillsong-related articles see here. From 21 June I noticed this list and that some 10+ of these PRODs were charting albums at either ARIA or Billboard. I have gone through more of the 50+ list and added sources where possible and dePRODed any that I felt had a reliable source for their existence. I was hoping to get time to supply further sources to attempt to establish notability. With so many articles to research this is not necessarily achievable in a short time-frame. The nominator has sent most of the dePRODed articles straight to AfD. I ask for time/assistance in actually searching for sources to support the articles' notability.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 10:20, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak keep, possibly keep~~ Reviewed by Cross Rhythms, as demonstrated in the article. There also are mentions in Business Review Weekly, Volume 24, Issues 32-38, page 67; Schwann Spectrum, Volume 10, page 803; The Bulletin, Issues 6437-6445, page 33; and NRB, Volume 30, page 134. These pages hits came up on Google, I cannot access them, and I think some refer to the song rather than the album. Thus my hesitancy to give this article a full "keep" vote.--¿3family6 _contribs 21:15, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Significant discussion in multiple sources are needed to support notability. Only one present. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:36, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - ~~Weak delete~~ I think the book mentions are brief discography lists. I can't find anything else after searching most of the relevant sources on WP:CCM/S. On the cusp of notability, but not quite. The song "The Power of Your Love" might be notable, but this album doesn't seem to quite be there.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:13, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Amending my vote again, per Shaidar cuebiyar below. The album was certified gold by ARIA. Shaidar, how did you find this?--¿3family6 _contribs 00:25, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Amended to a Strong Keep as album was certified gold by ARIA. The album has a solid review by Cross Rhythms, as well as an ACM mention and brief coverage in the magazines mentioned above.Jair Crawford (talk) 04:02, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Certified gold by ARIA.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:02, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Excellent. Thanks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:25, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.