Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fifth Sun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 07:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Fifth Sun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable album for non-notable band (band entry was speedied under A7). SchuminWeb (Talk) 10:33, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am also adding Bow to the Sceptor EP to this nomination for the same reason. SchuminWeb (Talk) 10:34, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: If, as you say, the band was speedied, the album is certainly not notable...... Dendodge .. Talk^Help 11:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable artist = non-notable album. Fails WP:MUSIC.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 12:33, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete per all above Carter | Talk to me 14:13, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Also note that the company that produces this is the one that made the article to begin with!--CyberGhostface (talk) 14:15, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unsourced article about a non-notable album with no assertion of notability. — Wenli ^{(reply here)} 04:49, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:04, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all, part of a WP:COATRACK by User:Galapagos4 about this artist/label. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.