Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SportsLink

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Gwen Gale (talk) 16:46, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SportsLink

I have doubts about the notability of this weekly programme on an Australian local community radio station, on which I would like the community to decide. Please take into consideration the original version of the article before I edited it, which was a pure advert. ➨ ЯEDVEЯS looks at danger and laughs his head off 12:10, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —IRK!_{Leave me a note or two} 22:49, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I agree the original version was exclusively an advert, in terms of notability, there are other radio program's listed on here that don't contain references and/or are not notable either. I think greater review is needed and more opinions before deletion.121.44.196.226 (talk) 03:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't thought a valid argument here. And greater review and more opinions is what this page is for. ➨ ЯEDVEЯS looks at danger and laughs his head off 08:58, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Shall I then begin nominating other articles for deletion then? From what I gather about this radio show, they have done quite a few interviews with people of interest in Australia. The show may not be famous however it has some standing. If we can't agree on that, then would it be worth to redirect this article to 94.7 The Pulse and put pretty much the same information that is on here already there?121.44.196.226 (talk) 02:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, "merge" is a perfectly acceptable thing to call for here - please feel free to do so. As for nominating other articles, yes, you can do that if you believe they have the same issues as this article, although I'd advise you don't do them all at once as that just annoys people. But you're perfectly entitled to nominate what you want when you want. ➨ ЯEDVEЯS looks at danger and laughs his head off 09:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:56, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to 94.7 The Pulse, local weekend show on community station lacks notability to be a standalone article, lacks secondary sources for verifiability, with a bit of sourcing would be a useful expansion for the station's current stubby article. - Dravecky (talk) 22:38, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Dravecky--Rtphokie (talk) 20:40, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.