Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rotaract Club of Manila

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rotaract. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 00:35, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rotaract Club of Manila

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a local youth wing of a Rotary Club. There is no significant coverage in independent reliable sources about this organisation, and as a sub-unit per WP:ORG, there is no demonstrated notability. Whpq (talk) 13:39, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Σ τ c. 19:45, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I worked to rescue this almost two years ago, because it's an especially large Rotaract Club. Now I'm not so sure that it's worth saving; it's become a cruft-magnet. I'd work with anyone who wants to write a better article. 21:26, 13 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bearian (talk • contribs)
Delete; subject does not appear to be independently notable per WP:GNG, keeping with WP:ORG a redirect to the parent organization should be left in it's article space. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:46, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rotaract as per WP:CLUB. Or delete entirely since anyone searching for it will find the Rotaract site. --MelanieN (talk) 21:31, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.