Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Partap Sehgal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:41, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Partap Sehgal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Not clear how this person meets WP:BIO, lacks references to significant coverage in 3rd party sources. RadioFan (talk) 23:28, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article is pretty bad, no references. If some reliable sources can be found this article should stay, but the crazy list should be cut down or removed. Right now though it should be deleted though, maybe I am being cynical but the article suggests a COI as well to me DRosin (talk) 19:39, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment- If citations could be provided, the article would meet notability standard.--^Nilotpal42 07:38, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak delete due to the lack of sourcing, but I can be convinced to change on this one quite easily. Nuttah (talk) 13:56, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Can't find notability evidence on Google in English, maybe if someone can search in Hindi? Surprisingly little found at Google Books - for a writer you would think there would be a lot. Again, maybe the problem is language, but on the current evidence he fails WP:Author. --MelanieN (talk) 23:16, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.