Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pack of Wolvz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BigDom talk 09:56, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pack of Wolvz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fixing incomplete nomination by 66.87.4.95 (talk · contribs). — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 22:38, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't seem to be notable. Don't seem to have charted in the Phlippines, much less internationally. WP:PROMO, creator of page (whose only contributions ARE this page) seems to be the bands promoter, per the article. VikÞor | Talk 23:00, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - insufficient references from reliable sources to establish notability under WP:GNG or WP:BAND. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:23, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is just an advertisement from their promoter, something wikipedia is not for. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability is non-existent. This article is a blatant advertisement. Evanh2008 (talk) 00:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.