Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Silverman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 20:50, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Silverman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. The only SNG that might apply is NCREATIVE and there is no indication he meets anything there John from Idegon (talk) 18:54, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:36, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:39, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:42, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:42, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:42, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:42, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:42, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:43, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Single-market local radio personalities are not handed an automatic inclusion freebie just because they exist, but this is not sourced well enough to get him over WP:GNG. Of the three footnotes here, #1 is a blog and #2 is his own staff profile on the website of his own employer, neither of which are notability-assisting sources at all — and while the third is an actual article in a real newspaper, it's in the local newspaper and it exists solely in the context of him buying a house rather than the context of anything potentially noteworthy about his career as a broadcaster. So that's not enough coverage to magically vault him over GNG all by itself as the only acceptable source in play. Bearcat (talk) 19:55, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable local radio personality.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:03, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG with lack of significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources.—Bagumba (talk) 07:49, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete Nothing shows that the GNG, or any other notability standard, is met.Sandals1 (talk) 21:54, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.