Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kombatan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kombatan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable martial art without third person sources stating why its notable. Dwanyewest (talk) 03:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Nominator continues to make AfDs without indicating in the edit summary of the article that that has happened. This makes it all too easy for editors to scan the recent changes and not be aware that an article has been nominated. This is inappropriate. JJL (talk) 14:40, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. — Janggeom (talk) 14:51, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Someone just added a bunch of sources, some of which appear to be independent. Unless someone shows these seemingly independent articles are not independent or don't contain sufficient coverage, than this art appears to pass the notability criteria. Astudent0 (talk) 17:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep The new references make this article worth saving, at least for the time being. I hope whoever added the references will link them to specific claims in the article. Papaursa (talk) 18:12, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.