Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Good
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Judith Good (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet the notability guidelines for academics and fails WP:GNG as there are only a few mentions of the name in the press and no significant coverage of biographical details. ℕ ℱ 22:36, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti Talk 19:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti Talk 19:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Citation record [1] is good for an early-career academic but not yet strong enough for WP:PROF#C1 and there seems to be nothing else. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 00:02, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 00:02, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - agree with nominator and above editor. Not enough coverage to meet notability guidelines yet. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.