Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joar Hoff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Not the largest number of opinions, but it seems clear nonetheless that there is significant coverage to satisfy gng. Fenix down (talk) 23:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joar Hoff

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD: "he ought to pass GNG as he has won the Norwegian First Division as a manager. a quick google search gave me https://www.aftenposten.no/sport/fotball/i/70BAM3/fotballtrener-joar-hoff-er-doed and https://www.fosna-folket.no/nyheter/2020/11/23/Joar-48-har-f%C3%A5tt-meitemarken-til-%C3%A5-trives-der-det-tidligere-var-fj%C3%A6ramark-23046589.ece, and there multiple articles in the norweigan newspaper archive" Still fails WP:NFOOTBALL as winning a part-time, semi-pro league in the 1970s is not inherently notable. The coverage alluded to looks like mostly lightweight sports-reporting fluff, falling short of WP:GNG. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - there appears to be significant coverage. Giant Snowman 19:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - it took me a few seconds to find four different newspapers printing articles specifically focused on him. Not even close to failing WP:GNG. Romerikes Blad, Glamdalen, Indre Akershus Blad and Sogn Avis Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.