Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Blankfort
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No arguments to keep - treating as an uncontested PROD Kevin (talk) 22:39, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Jeffrey Blankfort (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails to meet notability standards. Most of the content appears to be a copy/paste from SourceWatch. I don't see how this article could be salvaged unless anyone knows of any recent updates. Wikifan12345 (talk) 02:20, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:59, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The article is a mess, and radio host in Mendocino doesn't sound like much of a claim of notability — it's a very small town. But there may be some more notability/notoriety coming from his work in the 1960s with the Black Panthers. E.g. "Photos chronicle Black Panthers", Kristin Bender, Oakland Tribune, February 25, 2005, describing a show of his work at the Oakland Public Library. That article and show by themselves are still not enough for WP:CREATIVE, of course, but I suspect that with enough digging more could be found. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:57, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:58, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.