Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HappyTech
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- HappyTech (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
very clearly promotional, extremely thin, and extremely vague as well. I also can't really find any good sources outside of the ones provided on the page. Gaismagorm (talk) 15:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and France. Gaismagorm (talk) 15:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 17:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for organizations, lacking sufficient independent, reliable sources --Jiaoriballisse (talk) 10:54, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.