Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grant Fagan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:51, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grant Fagan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No qualifying awards. No independent reliable sourcing. No sourced biographical content. Thoroughly unencyclopedic text. Claimed award is borderline notable at best and falls well-below the well-known/significant standard; even if it were somehow seen as a technical pass, that couldn't outweigh the complete failure to meet sourcing requirements for a BLP. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 15:00, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails the notability guidelines for pornographic actors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- nothing suggests notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:32, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 02:31, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable. Lepricavark (talk) 02:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Concur with nominator's assessment. Finnegas (talk) 19:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not a single source except for the award. Should have been speedily deleted under WP:G10 as an unsourced attack page. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:19, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.