Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federal Vampire and Zombie Agency

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete this codswallop. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:03, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Federal Vampire and Zombie Agency

Fails WP:N. Google search shows several ghits, [1] but no significant coverage in secondary and third party reliable source. It has only a mention in USA Today, but that is not multiple reliable source and not significant coverage. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 04:31, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears to fail WP:N. Passing reference insufficient. Edison (talk) 04:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Normally, I'd propose a redirect to the material that uses the term, but I can't really discern what that is. Unfortunately, I think it's best to simply delete it. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 05:52, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think this is basically web content which should be judged per WP:WEB; the agency seems to have been created for the self-titled web site, not for a book or movie or other media. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:55, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sources sufficient to assert Notability. --Firefly322 (talk) 08:27, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per Celarnor Carter | Talk to me 11:52, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Somebody's web site for a fictional government agency WP:MADEUP in one day. Not even remotely notable. KleenupKrew (talk) 00:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as notable and verifiable subject. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 01:44, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP - valuable for explination of the site's satirical nature, which is not explained on the website —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.133.140.6 (talk) 21:18, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.