Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Famous (film)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:36, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Famous (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
After a year there don't seem to be any updates on this planned indie film in reliable sources despite the various stars who were apparently going to be involved, though there is no mention of them being involved anymore at IMDB. Official page is down as well so it could be in development hell. Seems claim to notability only ever hinged on a handful of reports about the intended cast. The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 06:19, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 06:40, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NFF. Since we do have some sourcability about casting and pre-production and it having begun filming last summer, I might have suggested a merge and redirect to its director... but as David Foote does not have an article, and as this thing is not expected for release until next year, this article is simply TOO SOON. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 09:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:38, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 00:47, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: one thing that is doubtless preventing this discussion from prospering is that the article's Afd template has a red link to this discussion; there's something wrong. Can someone fix it so the link here is a proper blue link that works? Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:01, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Should show up as blue now. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:04, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It does. Thanks, Tokyogirl79. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:29, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. This just doesn't pass WP:NFF. I have no problem with anyone wanting to userfy it, though. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:02, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Insignificant coverage and no more updates about the film's status. SL93 (talk) 18:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.