Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edyta Piasecka
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nominator has withdrawn their nomination and no Delete votes. Liz Read! Talk! 03:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Edyta Piasecka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability since 2018. Article is largely unreferenced which is not ok for a BLP article. Time to decide one way or another as a community if this meets WP:GNG. 4meter4 (talk) 00:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Women. 4meter4 (talk) 00:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Withdrawing. I think I can rescue this one myself in looking at sources in Polish in google translate.4meter4 (talk) 00:46, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Update. I've added several sources. Enough to establish WP:SIGCOV. If anyone wants to continue with cleaning it up and making it read less like a resume that would be great.4meter4 (talk) 01:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.