Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diadem of Maunstraut
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 18:06, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Diadem of Maunstraut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Another contested WP:PROD. Fangame which does not show any verifiable, third-party sources as to why this may be notable to a real-world audience. MuZemike (talk) 17:24, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 17:25, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MuZemike (talk) 05:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete 4 google results? Does not conform with the notability guideline due to a lack of reliable secondary sources dealing with the subject in detail. Someoneanother 14:57, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, appears to be pretty blatant advertising, since the article creator and game creator appear to be the same person. Lacks sources, WP:COI, etc etc. Nifboy (talk) 15:42, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The article and its creator have been reported to WP:COIN. MuZemike (talk) 17:17, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as I was also unable to verify this information. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 16:40, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Tone of article suggests it is an advertisement against current policy. Non-notable fan-site or game doktorb wordsdeeds 19:55, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.