Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denise Milani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:53, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Denise Milani

This person is not notable by Wikipedia standards. w^L^{<speak·check>} 15:52, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BIO. I would also argue WP:PORNBIO. No reliable sources. A lotta purty pics. This article has been deleted a ridiculous amount of times and recreated by the subject almost every time.--Sethacus 16:07, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BIO (and wouldn't pass WP:PORNBIO either). Since this is its seventh deletion, I strongly suggest Salting it as well. No reason to waste additional time on it. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt for failure to satisfy WP:BIO or WP:N and for recreations of the article after deletion. Edison 16:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the only notable thing about this article is the first reference: "Picture of large cleavage." Sheffield Steel^talk_stalk 17:08, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As a legs and butt man I vote delete as there are no legs and butts anywhere in this article... oh yes, she's totally non-notable too (other than how she manages to stop falling on her face) --WebHamster 17:37, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I hate to vote against her, given the fact that she's only 27 and already has two very large achievements. And I hasten to add that those achievements would be notable in any condominium parking lot in this country. Since she is an immigrant to the United States, perhaps her notability could be established if anybody has a video of her trying to get through the turnstiles at U.S. Customs. Then again, maybe that's a streeeeeetch. Qworty 19:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 22:40, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. From what I can tell, she doesn't fall under WP:PORNBIO, but irregardless there's no evidence of notability in the article. But just to be safe, I've listed this AFD in the WP:P* deletion alerts. Tabercil 22:40, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Prod was removed on basis of size of fan club but WP:BIG isn't a basis for notability. Canuckle 02:00, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment From this link, it seems she's done an interview for Czech television, although this doesn't count as independant coverage. Epbr123 15:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable. Sebi _[talk] 23:38, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt. Fails to make a clear assertion of notability per WP:BIO. If she does something notable down the road, we can reconsider then. —C.Fred (talk) 15:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I have to admit she barely passes the criteria, but the fact that the article has been recreated 7 times should indicate that people find her interesting. I first saw her on the Sports By Brooks website, where she's been their most popular model for years. I believe the main problem is that she rates a one paragraph "busty model with a big fan club" article, and instead we have a whole page of fluff and vandalism.Disposableman 07:35, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.