Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boursorama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:37, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boursorama

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was listed for PROD, "Unreferenced article about a non-notable business, an online stockbroker." There's much more extensive page at the frWP; given that, and the Euronext listing, I thought it better to have a community deccision. DGG ( talk ) 01:55, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as prodder. The article is about an online business and has no references. The link shown for Challenger, a French magazine, in Google News search (Boursorama joue la carte bancaire; "Boursorama plays the banking card") may be a RS, but the link is borked and does not take you to the article. The rest is the usual flood of business page coverage of routine reports and press releases. I read the fr: article; it is longer, but not referenced to third party sources either, only internal sites and business directories. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 05:36, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Company advert site posing as WP article, failing WP:ORG. scope_creep (talk) 00:28, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete blatant advert. LibStar (talk) 10:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete: Advert, nonencyclopaedic, violates WP:ORG guideline. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:16, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.