Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspect (Dungeons & Dragons)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aspect (Dungeons & Dragons)

Non notable Dungeons & Dragons monster created for the miniatures skirmish game then detailed in the Miniatures' Handbook, a supplement focusing on the use of miniatures in roleplay. No evidence of third party coverage, but may deserve a mention somewhere when discussing D&D deities. J Milburn (talk) 20:21, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kill with Fire Caste soldiers. -Jéské ^{(v^_^v :L13 ½-Raichu Soulknife)} 20:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Dgf32 (talk) 20:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 23:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge into, ah... List of Dungeons & Dragons deities I guess. Aspects have much more to do with dieties than monsters, and have been used extensively in the 3.5 edition of the game, for both gods and demon lords/archdevils. BOZ (talk) 23:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — non-notable. Unsourced. Mention in a list. Cheers, Jack Merridew 06:14, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No secondary sources, no assertion of notability. Fails WP:RPG/N and WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 10:36, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable stock characters with no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate real world notability outside D&D. --Gavin Collins (talk) 15:41, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — non-notable. just another term for an avatar. shadzar-talk 20:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The concept of an aspect of a god is a common religious concept in Christianity. [1] It's sort of a hack to reconcile monotheism with polytheism. Amusingly, Wikipedia doesn't have an article on the religious usage, but it has one on the D&D usage. --John Nagle (talk) 20:08, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- then maybe that means the avatar article needs to be changed to related other religions uses of similar concepts? shadzar-talk 23:12, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.