Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejandro Abadie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Revert back to the rugby union player article. Per consensus Less Unless (talk) 20:35, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alejandro Abadie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a complex AfD because this article was actually hijacked in Aug 2012. Previously, this was about an Argentine international rugby union player. The footballer of this name has only played at a very low level in Argentina and doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. Searches in Google, ProQuest, DDG etc. only return results relating to rugby union.

If both the rugby player and the footballer are non-notable, then we simply delete this article. If the rugby player is notable but the footballer isn't, then please revert the hijacking. If both are notable then please can an admin do some sort of splitting of the histories so we have Alejandro Abadie (footballer) with relevant edit history and Alejandro Abadie (rugby union) with relevant edit history? Sorry if AfD is not the best venue but I feel that notability is questionable here so AfD was what I thought would be best. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:12, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There appears to be reasonable coverage on the rugby player, along with the sourcing on Italian wiki, there's this interview and this interview that I've found in a basic google search of his name, it appears he's certainly notable, and coverage is very similar to other Argentine few cap international rugby union players from the era. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:43, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.