Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Women's Cricket World Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Women's Cricket World Cup. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience ^t 00:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Women's Cricket World Cup

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deletion under criteria in Wikipedia:Future event. Article is prima facie unencyclopedic, because this event, which is 6 years away, is unverifiable with a non-reliable source. Carwile2 ^{*Shoot me a message*} 21:11, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom; Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Simple as that. -- Orduin ^Discuss 00:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Women's Cricket World Cup until a bit closer to the event. But why would you call The Hindu a non-reliable source? The-Pope (talk) 04:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per The Pope. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 07:48, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - Crystal ball exercise. Carrite (talk) 14:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.