User talk:SADER & ASSOCIATES

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:SADER & ASSOCIATES, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages: user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: Click here to contest this speedy deletion which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Glaisher [talk] 17:19, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

• Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
• Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
• Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. INeverCry (talk) 17:30, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SADER & ASSOCIATES (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Haykal Chaaya (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Dear Peridon and James, Thank you for your replies that made it clear. I understand now that everything on Wikipedia should be 0 promotional. I appreciate if you can give me a link of a company page on Wikipedia so i can have an idea on how the company contents should be written. I kindly request to have a trial on writing to Wikipedia, maybe i can send the text to you in case my ip will stay blocked. I also understand that the attorneys should write the articles by themselves (they already did) but i will be coordinating with Wikipedia on behalf of them... what's the best way to do that? what should I do? Thank you for your patience.

Decline reason:

If you are worrying about how an articles is 'searched', you are most likely creating it with promotional intentions. Also, Wikipedia is not a free webhost for you to post articles written by your attorneys on any subject. If they write articles for here, they should post them, not you. Please note that while there may be articles here on other firms, this does not entitle yours to an article. Notability has to be asserted and proved with reliable independent sources (see WP:CORP and WP:RS). Peridon (talk) 09:35, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You say that you "have no intention to market any company or make any advertisement", but you have posted such stuff as "Working with a united vision, the Firm has achieved a 99% success rate, thanks to its attorneys’ analytical skills and team’s fast response", "the Firm believes in delivering diagnostic precision, prompt action and transparency, relying on its dedication to the rule of law in representing its clients", etc. Does this mean that you did intend to "market any company or make any advertisement" at that time, but have now changed your mind, or does it mean that you do not regard that as marketing and advertising? JamesBWatson (talk) 21:06, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the examples you choose to illustrate the kind of article you wish to write are not good advertisements for your cause, because they are both heavily promotional. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom in particular contains blatantly promotional text, and needs to be cleaned up or deleted. Thank you for drawing attention to it, so that it can be dealt with. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:32, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]