User talk:Jack Tarre

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is written like a social media profile, and is not written from a neutral point of view. It is suggested that the author request advice at the Teahouse on how to write a neutral biography of a living person. This does not mean that the subject is biographically notable, and it does not mean that she is not biographically notable. It means that this draft needs to be rewritten.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jennifer Kumiyama and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jack Tarre! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jennifer Kumiyama and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jennifer Kumiyama. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jack Tarre, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Jennifer Kumiyama to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

• The Teahouse - ask Wikipedians for general editing help
• Articles for Creation Help Desk - ask reviewers for draft article help
• Creating your first article
• Referencing for beginners
• Wikipedia Manual of Style

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liance^talk 19:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the warm Wikipedia welcome! I appreciate it! If you have the time to review the Draft:Jennifer Kumiyama article I'm very interested in your thoughts. Best, JT Jack Tarre (talk) 15:11, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jack Tarre, this is a courtesy note that your article is now located at the pagename Jennifer Kumiyama without the disambiguator, and I've cleaned up the grammar of the page link. Please continue to improve the page despite the page no longer being in the draftspace. Thanks, and welcome to Wikipedia, Bobby Cohn (talk) 23:02, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, thank you, thank you! It feels wonderful to create my first article and I greatly appreciate your help, and the help and advice of all the other Wiki editors. I will earnestly try to improve Wikipedia in any small way while respecting my responsibilities as a member of the Wikipedia family. All the best! Jack Tarre (talk) 14:44, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jack Tarre. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 05:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you assistance and for your sage advice. Please be assured that I do not have a conflict of interest involving this article. I have not, nor would I ever, accept payment or gratuities of any form for my efforts on Wikipedia. My years in print journalism taught me that lesson! I do appreciate and respect your advice and thank you for it. All the best. Jack Tarre (talk) 15:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]