Jump to content

Talk:Patriots of Russia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

A recent addition by User:Gnomsovet “On election deputy legislative organ subject to Russian Federation 1 March 2009 party has got 4 places from 73 in Karachay-Cherkessia and 3 from 75 in Khakassia.” perhaps my dear colleague might paraphrase it so that I could grasp the meaning? I have a strong suggestion to Gnomsovet, that if he still wishes to experiment in Wikipedia, he might establish a sandbox page in his userspace, where he can freely propose changes to articles, and users with more English skills would first revise them so that the Wikipedia readers might be able to comprehend our articles without having to use translation software for the original Russian source. --Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 01:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

in different places the article describes the party as both "left-wing" (info box) and "right-wing" (text) nationalist... some clarification is needed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.130.82.154 (talk) 01:15, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Patriotsofrussia.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Patriotsofrussia.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 22 September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:58, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ideology

[edit]

I'd be fascinated if anyone has a link to more information about this party's ideological stance. The article lists its ideological positions as Democratic Socialism and Collectivism. This is an unusual combination because Democratic Socialism is a Western political construct established to distance itself from the excesses and abuses caused by the collectivism of many strains of Marxist ideology, Marxism-Leninism in particular. Democratic Socialism by its very design has a more individualistic orientation. 121.73.7.84 (talk) 16:24, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]