Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Gordonrox24
Appearance
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Successful. –Juliancolton | Talk 14:57, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Gordonrox24
[change source]- Gordonrox24 (talk · contribs)
End date: 21:30, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi everyone. I am here to nominate Gordonrox24 for adminship. Gordon is an active user here who has over 3k edits, including 250+ QD requests. He has 65% of his edits in the mainspace; however he also participates in discussions in AN, Simple Talk and RFD. He is an excellent vandalism fighter and has several rollbacks and ViP reports. I think he will assist the community greatly if he becomes an admin. Pmlineditor ∞ 12:56, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Candidate's acceptance:I accept Pmlineditor's kind nomination.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 21:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support
[change source]- Yes, will be helpful for the current team. Barras talk 21:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Can't think of a reason to oppose. Griffinofwales (talk) 21:53, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure. –Juliancolton | Talk 21:59, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Helpful, clueful, friendly user. Lauryn☆ 23:43, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Seems he has a need for the tools. However, most of his edits to the mainspace consist of minor changes. I think he should be a little more active in expanding articles. Megan|talkchanges 03:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strongly support I trust this user.-- † CR90 03:16, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. He is a good user who has done a lot to improve this project and that I have no doubt would continue to assume good faith and use his powers to improve the project. Kansan (talk) 03:35, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Indeed, more than 60% of his work has been on articles, which is quite impressive!! He seems to be civil and thoughtful, and not the kind of person to misuse the tools. Classical Esther 04:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Per nom, obviously. Pmlineditor ∞ 07:14, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- fr33kman 07:18, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Of course. He is very active (3k edits), a good vandal fighter, and a friendly editor. :) --Bsadowski1(Talk|Changes) 07:19, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Seems stable. Nifky^ 07:21, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strongly support per Pmlineditor. I think he's quite nice, nothing bad!! Besides, I've heard of his name many times. He did alot of good article edits, too. :) I can also trust Pmlineditor in his opinions, because he's very sensible. If Pmlineditor says Gordon is good, I'm almost wholly sure he's a wonderful user. Belle (talk) 07:23, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure. -- Mentifisto 07:40, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No problems here - Peterdownunder (talk) 09:15, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Helpful candidate. --Mercy (talk) 09:22, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- —§ stay (sic)! 12:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Fine by me Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 16:29, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Will use the tools well. Quantum4 Send me a message 16:33, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support f o x (formerly garden) 22:33, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- --cremepuff222 (talk) 08:38, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Definitely no trauma with this nomination. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:52, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Freindly good, great editor. Buggie111 (talk) 23:26, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Definitely yes. Because Gordon rox. -- Tdxiang 03:34, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- --MisterWiki (talk) 18:47, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support will be a good admin. RP459 (talk) 00:55, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
[change source]Comments
[change source]- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.