Jump to content

User talk:VS6507

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

If you find this page on a site that is not Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. The page may be old and the owner of this page may not have a relationship with sites that are not Wikipedia. The original page is located at http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:VS6507.

Wikimedia Foundation
Wikimedia Foundation
This is the User talk page for VS6507, where you can send messages and comments to VS6507.


Welcome to Simple English Wikipedia

[change source]
Hi, Aleksa Lukic, welcome to Simple English Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes. If you need help, check out the Help section of Wikipedia, or leave a message on my talk page. Whenever leaving messages on talk pages, please remember to sign your name by typing four 'tildes' (like this: ~~~~); doing this makes your name and the date show up. Also, it helps if you write something in the box that says 'change summary' whenever you change an article. Below are some useful links to make your time here simpler. Happy changing! fr33kman 00:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Other

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Sure, why not. Seems plausible.

Request handled by: fr33kman 00:04, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[change source]

Obviously we will have to place you under a single-strike rule given your history here. I am willing to accept your unblock request because the onus is on you and a reblock is a simple matter. I believe you've probably changed, although some of the old personality seems there as well (enwiki contribs). Welcome back there is lots to do. We need more WP:DYK hooks and help in article expansion and WP:VGA nominations etc... Cheerio and bon chance :) fr33kman 00:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. What actually means "single-strike rule", and what questionable edits of mine did you found on the English Wikipedia? AleksA 14:16, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

[change source]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make helpful changes to Wikipedia. However, some of your changes, like those to "Cytoplasm", did not seem to be helpful and have been reverted or removed. If you want to try out changing Wikipedia to learn more about how it works, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Auntof6 (talk) 21:47, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I still strongly think that my edits (revert) was good-faith and productive. Cheers, Alex’s SeaSide 08:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why is it "good-faith and productive" to remove a space from between two words? --Auntof6 (talk) 19:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'd encourage you to remember the section above, you are still under a one-strike rule. Auntof6 did not require to give you any warning, and you could have been indef blocked. Kennedy (talk) 12:11, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Simple explanation

[change source]

This edit wasn't nonconstructive, because "Due to this network of fibres" is still in text... Please stop telling me I did something wrong what I didn't. Thanks Alex’s SeaSide 08:57, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it was a mistake, I thought I reverted TO "Due to this network of fibres", NOT to "network offibres". Alex’s SeaSide 09:01, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Template:Politics by continent templates

[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Template:Politics by continent templates, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at the RfD page and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Auntof6 (talk) 06:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]