2017
DOI: 10.1107/s205979831700225x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

`Atomic resolution': a badly abused term in structural biology

Abstract: The term `atomic resolution' is very often abused in presenting macromolecular structures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The appearance of the maps based on crystallographic data depends on both the extent of diffraction data and on the quality of the indirectly determined phases. Thus it is not surprising that maps calculated by us at the same 1.8 Å resolution appear to be better for insulin and ferredoxin, the two structures phased with data extending to truly atomic resolution (Wlodawer and Dauter, 2017), than for sedolisin and thioesterase, where the limit of the observable data has already been reached. Also, whereas a single descriptor of the resolution of crystallographic maps is routinely utilized, the quality of the maps is not uniform in space and the electron density is often less clear in some areas, especially on the surface of proteins, in places not involved in crystal contacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The appearance of the maps based on crystallographic data depends on both the extent of diffraction data and on the quality of the indirectly determined phases. Thus it is not surprising that maps calculated by us at the same 1.8 Å resolution appear to be better for insulin and ferredoxin, the two structures phased with data extending to truly atomic resolution (Wlodawer and Dauter, 2017), than for sedolisin and thioesterase, where the limit of the observable data has already been reached. Also, whereas a single descriptor of the resolution of crystallographic maps is routinely utilized, the quality of the maps is not uniform in space and the electron density is often less clear in some areas, especially on the surface of proteins, in places not involved in crystal contacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Whereas NMR does not directly address the question of resolution (although NMR structures are often described in the literature as “high resolution”) (Wlodawer and Dauter, 2017), the concept of resolution is inherently relevant to both crystallography and cryo-EM. For crystallographic analyses, resolution refers to the extent of observable diffraction data, although the question where to terminate the data sets (and whether to use extremely weak high-resolution structure amplitudes) has not been completely settled (Karplus and Diederichs, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be a concern when the molecular functions of the same atomic model with the same mean B ‐factor are claimed to have very different resolutions. In fact, the term resolution has been abused commonly in structural biology, where terms like super‐resolution, atomic resolution, or near‐atomic resolution often have nothing to do with reality. Atomic‐resolution electron microscopy does exist and emerges in material sciences, that is atomic ESP shape function can indeed be experimentally visualized; and that physically differs from what is being currently claimed in the cryo‐EM community for macromolecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of ‘resolution’ is problematic in crystallography as well as in cryo-EM: a problem that has been highlighted by Wlodawer & Dauter (2017) and re-emphasized in the context of cryo-EM by Wlodawer et al (2017). In crystallography the resolution is defined by the highest Miller index present in the data file.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%