2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2017.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Resolution Cryo-EM Maps and Models: A Crystallographer's Perspective

Abstract: Summary The appearance of ten high-resolution cryo-EM maps of proteins, ribosomes, and viruses was compared to the experimentally phased crystallographic electron density maps of four proteins. We found that maps calculated at a similar resolution by the two techniques are quite comparable in their appearance, although cryo-EM maps, even when sharpened, seem to be a little less detailed. An analysis of models fitted to the cryo-EM maps indicated the presence of significant problems in almost all of them, inclu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, Pearson's correlation coefficients are 0.17 and -0.09 for X-ray and cryo-EM, respectively. It is important to mention that the way in which these techniques determine the resolution is different [23], and consequently their maps and models could not be equivalent [24]. In our data set, solely 2% of structures were obtained by cryo-EM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Indeed, Pearson's correlation coefficients are 0.17 and -0.09 for X-ray and cryo-EM, respectively. It is important to mention that the way in which these techniques determine the resolution is different [23], and consequently their maps and models could not be equivalent [24]. In our data set, solely 2% of structures were obtained by cryo-EM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The concept of ‘resolution’ is problematic in crystallography as well as in cryo-EM: a problem that has been highlighted by Wlodawer & Dauter (2017) and re-emphasized in the context of cryo-EM by Wlodawer et al (2017). In crystallography the resolution is defined by the highest Miller index present in the data file.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation measures also have to be further developed and standardized. As was recently highlighted, there are many issues still remaining (203). For example, in many of the current models derived from cryo-EM maps, experimental temperature factors lie outside of the expected range of values given the nominal map resolution, waters are not accounted for or lie outside of density, geometry is poor with many interatomic clashes, and there are no standard methods for sharpening or thresholding the maps (203).…”
Section: Jbc Reviews: Challenges and Opportunities In Cryo-emmentioning
confidence: 99%