Jahan Claes

Jahan Claesjahan-claes

Oct 23 2024 03:10 UTC

Just FYI, if you've got a BSM that works >66% of the time, you can do fault-tolerant quantum computation with *unencoded* 6-ring resource states, which are a lot more feasible to generate, see https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.00019.

There's also some subsequent discussion of this construction (and a few others) in https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.16122

Sep 05 2024 13:19 UTC

This looks great, looking forward to reading it in more detail!

Just FYI, the partial dot product notation Argyris and I used in our proof was generally disliked by referees, so we've updated our paper to not use it (will be updated on arXiv at some point).

Instead of partial dot products, you can write this as an operator acting on a vector
$$
\vec v_2'\odot(\vec v_1\otimes\vec v_2) =(I_1\otimes \vec v_2'^T) \cdot (\vec v_1\otimes\vec v_2)
$$
which people seem to like better.

Aug 05 2024 16:01 UTC
Aug 05 2024 02:00 UTC
Recently, a lot of effort has been devoted towards designing erasure qubits in which dominant physical noise excites leakage states whose population can be detected and returned to the qubit subspace. Interest in these erasure qubits has been driven by studies showing that the requirements for fault-tolerant quantum error correction are significantly relaxed when noise in every gate operation is dominated by erasures. However, these studies assume perfectly accurate erasure checks after every gate operation which generally come with undesirable time and hardware overhead costs. In this work, we investigate the consequences of using an imperfect but overhead-efficient erasure check for fault-tolerant quantum error correction with the surface code. We show that, under physically reasonable assumptions on the imperfect erasure checks, the threshold error rate is still at least over twice that for Pauli noise. We also study the impact of imperfect erasure checks on the effective error distance and find that it degrades the effective distance under a general error model in which a qubit suffers from depolarizing noise when interacting with a leaked qubit. We then identify a more restrictive but realistic noise model for a qubit that interacts with a leaked qubit, under which the effective error distance is twice that for Pauli noise. We apply our analysis to recently proposed superconducting dual-rail erasure qubits and show that achieving good performance surface code quantum memories with relaxed system requirements is possible.
Jul 31 2024 12:53 UTC
Jul 31 2024 12:53 UTC
Mar 08 2024 03:46 UTC
Mar 07 2024 16:47 UTC
Dec 08 2023 13:51 UTC
Jahan Claes scited Yoked surface codes
Dec 06 2023 16:13 UTC

"All cluster states are local-Clifford equivalent to a stabilizer state" Did you mean the reverse: all stabilizer states are local-Clifford equivalent to a cluster state? Cluster states are already stabilizer states; the more interesting fact is that (as your GHZ example illustrates) an arbitrary stabilizer state can be locally Clifford deformed to a cluster state.