22
$\begingroup$

Copper is orange; gold is yellow; silver, platinum and lead are white (chromatically speaking).

Why are there no metals that are blue or green?

Why do the colours of cold metals follow, more or less, the same red-orange-yellow-white sequence that heated materials follow? I understand why hot materials follow that sequence; but not why metals seem to follow the same sequence.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I don't understand the terminology "cold metals" and "hot metals". Can you explain? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 19 at 2:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @NilayGhosh The author intends to mean that the color of blackbody radiation from metals (or any other objects) goes from dull red to red, orange, yellow, and then white as you heat them up, like in this image of hot metal bar. But the palette is limited, and there is not temperature where an object would be so hot that it's glowing green or blue. $\endgroup$
    – user430580
    Commented Sep 19 at 14:09
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You don't ask about it, but there is also a purple metal: there's an alloy of aluminum and gold, which us electrical engineers call "purple plague" due to the problems its accidental formation can cause in electronics, that's bright purple. I believe there's at least one company that uses it in jewelry. $\endgroup$
    – Hearth
    Commented Sep 19 at 15:12
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Hearth You are correct that purple gold exists, but could it still be considered a metal? I think it is not really a metal nor an alloy, but an intermetallic compound, aluminum auride. Unlike most metals and alloys, it is brittle and has low electrical conductivity (that's why its formation in electronics is so problematic). Meanwhile, actual alloys tend to be retain ductility, malleability and conductivity of electrical current. $\endgroup$
    – user430580
    Commented Sep 19 at 15:49
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @user430580 It's conductive enough that I think there is at least some amount of metallic bonding. Intermetallics make up the microstructure of all alloys that aren't metallic glasses; the presence of an intermetallic compound doesn't necessarily imply the result is nonmetallic. The issue with purple plague in particular is, as I understand it, more due to its brittleness leading to voiding in the bond foot, resulting in less contact area. It does have significantly lower conductivity than gold or aluminum, but so do many pure metals, like lead or tungsten. $\endgroup$
    – Hearth
    Commented Sep 20 at 2:32

4 Answers 4

32
$\begingroup$

For a frame challenge, there actually are metals that are green and blue. For a green metal, an alloy of silver and gold is also sometimes called "green gold" and has a color described as green-yellow or greenish-yellow.

image
Image source: Wikipedia

For a blue metal, there is osmium. On the photo, you can clearly see osmium's blue color in contrast to the coin's plain silver hue.

image
Source: luciteria.com

$\endgroup$
8
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ Nice photo and very good you are not touching the osmium! $\endgroup$
    – Ed V
    Commented Sep 18 at 21:53
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ The osmium certainly does look blue, and so I guess my question is somewhat moot. I'm not convinced by the "green gold", however. The Wikipedia article shows no images that are "greenish" beyond doubt. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 18 at 22:29
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ physics.stackexchange.com/questions/408847/… is a good resource on osmium. $\endgroup$
    – Jon Custer
    Commented Sep 19 at 1:33
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ That photo might be shifted towards blue. For best results the sample should be photographed beside a color test chart. $\endgroup$
    – Pablo H
    Commented Sep 19 at 15:16
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Zinc is also described as bluish. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 19 at 16:24
30
$\begingroup$

There are various issues at play here to discuss.

To begin with the simple examples, copper, silver, and gold are all fcc metals with a nearly perfect spherical Fermi surface for the electrons. This results in two things: the electronic (and hence optical) properties are isotropic, and it is reasonable to consider the conduction electrons as a nearly perfect electron gas.

Considering the interactions of an electron gas with light, the key parameter is the plasma frequency, the natural harmonic frequency that the electron gas can slosh around. To a first approximation this is given by:

$$\omega_{p}^{2} = {4 \pi n e^{2} \over m}$$

with $n$ the number density of free electrons and $m$ the effective mass of the electron in the band structure of interest.

One can now consider the electron gas as a Lorentz oscillator - for incident light below the plasma frequency the electrons readily respond to the time varying field and the metal readily reflects there. Above the plasma frequency the electrons can no longer respond and light penetrates the metal and reflectivity is reduced there. This fairly simple theory explains the response of copper, silver, and gold. For copper and gold the plasma frequency is in the visible range, and the reflectivity in the blue and green is reduced so they look reddish. If you could see into the near UV you could see the silver reflectivity drop there.

Some comments and answers bring up osmium, which is a good example of where the simple plasma frequency model runs into trouble for many different reasons. The first reason is straightforward - osmium has an hcp crystal structure so we expect different electrical and optical behavior in different directions (within the basal plane, and perpendicular to the basal plane). As one example of a non-isotropic hcp electronic structure I'll point to my answer to this question for the hcp beryllium electronic structure. There the 'cigar' structure is the Fermi surface for holes and the 'coronet' is the Fermi surface for electrons - yes, the conducting charge in the basal plane is different from the conducting charge perpendicular to the basal plane, as confirmed by Hall measurements in the different crystal directions.

Now, what is happening with osmium? First, like beryllium, it turns out that there is both electron and hole contributions to the conductivity, each having separate Fermi surface. And, since osmium has way more electrons, the electronic structure is way more complicated. Fortunately, the Fermi surface has been measured (Kamm and Anderson, Phys Rev B 2(8) 2944 (1970)). Figure 7 from the paper shows the electron Fermi surfaces:

enter image description here

Yes, two surfaces, neither terribly spherical, nested one inside the other.

For completeness sake, Figure 12 is the hole Fermi surface:

enter image description here

But, why is osmium "blue". The answer lies in those nested electron Fermi surfaces. This structure allow interband transitions from one Fermi surface to the other, and it turns out that these occur primarily below the blue, leaving a strong impression of blue for the color. More on the optical response can be found in Nemoshkalenko et al., Sov. Phys. JETP 63(1) 115 (1986).

So, yes, osmium does not behave like copper, silver, or gold. The differences highlight the need to often consider details of the crystal structure and the resulting electronic structure, Fermi surfaces, and their impact on optical properties.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This answer certainly looks comprehensive and detailed. Unfortunately, however, it is of precisely zero use to laymen such as myself. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 19 at 19:20
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @SodAlmighty - well, could you clarify on what level of physics might be of more use to you? $\endgroup$
    – Jon Custer
    Commented Sep 19 at 20:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As a maybe slightly more advanced layperson than OP, may I suggest maybe defining "isotropic", front-loading the fact the metal reflects in certain frequencies and not others before the explanation for why, and maybe a "better" explanation of plasma frequencies even though I'm not sure I can articulate better "how"... Like, does it have a relationship to the light emitted when they heat up? Maybe "resonance" instead of "harmonic" and also add an explanation of that very notion? $\endgroup$
    – Oosaka
    Commented Sep 20 at 14:21
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Like, I'll tell you what I understood, as someone who understands a lot of these words and concepts but didn't know the answer to the question: 1) metals reflect light whose frequency is under their plasma frequency, which is their electrons' resonance frequency, but not light whose frequency is above, and 2) Osmium does not follow that rule because of its crystalline structure (which I assume leads to diffraction & interference effects, I actually didn't do more than skim beyond that point. If that's accurate then maybe that helps you identify the central concepts that need dumbing down... $\endgroup$
    – Oosaka
    Commented Sep 20 at 14:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ My level of physics (and chemistry) is sufficient to mostly understand Oosaka’s comments; but my formal education on the subjects is limited to GCSE level. I am hopelessly lost when trying to understand this answer. This is my failing, of course, not yours Jon. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 20 at 16:30
11
$\begingroup$

There are several factors to consider, but the general answer would be that there are metals with cold colors. Osmium is an example of metal with a bluish hue. Its brightness is more recognizable than its color, but I'd say this is inherent to metals, which have good reflection due to their metallic properties.

Note that the initial question is quite large since "metallic" behaviour has different acceptations:

  • there are different definitions for metals, depending on the chemical/electrical properties that are considered.
  • depending on the pressure and temperature, some elements (cease to) exhibit a metallic behavior, such as iodine at 40 000 times atmospheric pressure.

On another side, the colors we see depend on physical/biological process that can be unrelated to metallic structures. I'm thinking of

  • the fact that the color of a metal depends on the ambient light
  • metamerism, which can make a metal appear as grey even if some part of its absorption spectrum is located towards the red-orange-yellow part of the spectrum.
$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Indeed, "there are different definitions of metals." In astrophysics, the term "metal" refers to any element heavier than hydrogen and helium, including carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, iron, and more. $\endgroup$
    – Nightrider
    Commented Sep 19 at 7:58
0
$\begingroup$

The electronic structure of metals influences their color. Metals like copper and gold have specific electron transitions that lead to their characteristic colors. Blue or green would require different transitions or mechanisms not common in the visible range for metals.

The color of metals is often due to their electronic structure and how they interact with visible light. For example, copper's reddish color comes from its specific electronic transitions that absorb and reflect particular wavelengths.

I hope you understand

Thank You

$\endgroup$
4
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ Well, it isn't specific electronic transitions. It has to do with the electron plasma frequency in copper and gold, making them absorb, rather than reflect, photons with energies above the plasma frequency. That particular mechanism cannot absorb red while continuing to reflect blue/green. $\endgroup$
    – Jon Custer
    Commented Sep 18 at 12:44
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @JonCuster +1 for your comment. If you could flesh it out into an answer, I'd upvote that too. $\endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Commented Sep 18 at 13:01
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @JonCuster Wait.....so you are saying that the nature of metals is to have an "absorption floor", above which all frequencies of light are absorbed, and below which they are not? Presumably only certain metals do this; or else the osmium that others have mentioned could not be blue. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 18 at 22:19
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I also seem to recall that the yellow color of gold actually is due to relativistic effects... $\endgroup$
    – Michael
    Commented Sep 19 at 8:24

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.