Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 December 16

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goofy kid.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copy of photo, orphaned file, unknown subject  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:39, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• I notice that the file is tagged both as PD and under GNU-FDL, which it can't be both. It looks like it was signed "Defoe, F", which is the same last name but different initial of the subject in the photo, which raises concerns about the ownership of the photo. A relative, maybe? Regardless, it is very questionable. Dennis Brown (talk) 11:14, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Falk--murder inc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is a screenshot from a 1960 film. It is tagged with {{PD-US-no notice}}, but is using non-free use rationale. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 00:51, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• It looks like it was uploaded as PD but with wrong template, which triggered the bot to mark a warning about needing a rationale for each use, which the uploader attempted. Not sure if it actually qualifies as PD, but if it does, it is just a matter of templates. Dennis Brown (talk) 11:20, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe the film is in public domain. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 04:54, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cow parade la jolla, ca 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Modern 3D artwork in USA - no Freedom of Panorama  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 01:17, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• In this case, it is nothing but the art in the photo, and I would agree. Dennis Brown (talk) 11:26, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Got art.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Modern 3D artwork in USA - no Freedom of Panorama  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 01:25, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Full photos of nothing but the art, or any photo that could take away the copyright owner's ability to exclusively profit from their work would qualify, but since it is a photo with context of the art showing the location as well, I would disagree that it is a violation of the intent of the law. Dennis Brown (talk) 11:25, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:SaoPaulo AvPaulista.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Has source which says "As fotos desta seção podem ser usadas livremente para propósitos não comerciais" (translated as The photos in this section may be used freely for non-commercial purposes). Therefore, not Wiki approved (or PD, as claimed) due to the non-commercial line :Jay8g ^{Hi!- I am... -What I do...} _{WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM} 03:43, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:RodolphFaneDeSalisbyGSWatson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Originally uploaded with bad licence (painted 1928), includes copyright notice in metadata, WP:OTRS ticket offers no evidence of permission. memphisto 13:02, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

painter died over 70 years ago, thus images are out of copyright.86.24.45.42 (talk) 07:31, 17 December 2011 (UTC) That comment was by Rodolph (talk) 15:49, 21 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Then why did you originally tag it with the "first published prior to January 1, 1923" rationale? memphisto 17:02, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

because the TAG for 70 years was'nt apparrent. In any case a mistake in my tag should'nt justify a deletion.Rodolph (talk) 19:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Howard Comer.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• contributor changed data on file thereby indicating s/he did not take the photo. Metadata on image has no indication that photo was created by a US government employee as an official activity. S. Rich (talk) 14:14, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I updated to a newer photo which was taken at a different location. I just forgot to update the location information. If you look back at the versions of the photo you'll see what I mean. I could not figure out how to delete the photo when I wanted to use a better quality one. So I uploaded a new one on top of the old one that was taken at a different place & time.

So sorry, I hope this makes sense. Phillipc69 (talk) 14:07, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

I believe US government photos have metadata showing they are official-type photos. For example, [File:GEN Carter F.Ham 2011.jpg] shows that Monica King took the photo and its' source is an official website. This image does not have such data. So, if the photo was taken by a private individual, even if a government employee at the time, then that individual must release the photo. If the high school or school district owns the photo, then that institution must release the photo.--S. Rich (talk) 15:11, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Godzilla(01)reverse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative of deleted file - see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Godzilla （01）.jpg - images of 3D artworks in Japan are non-commercial only  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:34, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keep Brighton Beach Clean IMG 1760.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a derivative work. Eligible for copyright? MGA73 (talk) 20:55, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sculpture in Odessa, TX Picture 1832.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No FOP in the US for statues. MGA73 (talk) 20:56, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agreed - sculpted by Una Hanbury, www.sculptureinthepark.org/pdfs/BensonSculptureGardenMap.pdf (No.32) dates it at 1991  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:09, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pioneer family sculpture in Lubbock, TX IMG 0210.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No FOP in the US for statues. Could be old but no information about that. Not used. MGA73 (talk) 21:02, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bass fishing in Zapata County, TX IMG 2029.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No FOP in the US for signs/adds. MGA73 (talk) 21:03, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Billy Hall bust in Laredo, TX IMG 1779.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No FOP in the US for statues. MGA73 (talk) 21:06, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert H. Bolton grave IMG 1118.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No FOP in the US for statues. MGA73 (talk) 21:11, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bust of Victor Westphall IMG 0443.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No FOP in the US for statues. MGA73 (talk) 21:11, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glenna Goodacre's statue IMG 0439.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No FOP in the US for statues. MGA73 (talk) 21:12, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haley IMG 0363.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No FOP in the US for paintings. No proof of permission. Getting permission to take a picture is one thing. How do we know if the permission was "to release under a free license"? MGA73 (talk) 21:14, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rick Husband statue IMG 0174.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No FOP in the US for statues. MGA73 (talk) 21:19, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand Ayatollah Ali Safi Golpaygani.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Google Translation of ref shows "This site are property" not "The site is permitted Reference" - anyway neither really shows suitability for Wikipedia.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:05, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Given that the subject is deceased, a fair use argument should be applied here. Buffs (talk) 19:50, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• I contacted a Iranian editor (Surena) to translate the text as per the editor:

This image have Unknown copying law, that sentence you Say (" نقل مطالب سایت با ذکر منبع بلامانع است ") meaning "just you can use this site content by name of site" (empahsis mine)

In view of above translation it seems site permits usage of content if we give proper Attribution to site by naming it.

--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider^tc_s 09:06, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand Indonesia Exterior.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• FOP does not exist for buildings in Indonesia. Article 29 of Indonesian copyright law states that the term of protection for the author’s work is protected for a period of fifty years after the author's death  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:21, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand indonesia 2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:21, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:1000 Lebanese Pounds Obverse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No information given about copyright status of Lebanese currency, only that photo is said to be under Creative Commons license. —innotata 23:16, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:1000 Lebanese Pounds Reverse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No information given about copyright status of Lebanese currency, only that photo is said to be under Creative Commons license. —innotata 23:18, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grave of Henri Curiel.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There is no panorama freedom in Belgium.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:18, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not to sure if this is the place to discuss this, so please point me to the right place if I'm wrong. The photo was not taken in Belgium, but in France at the Père Lachaise cemetery. I made the photo myself. France also does not seem to have "panorama freedom" but I find other pictures of graves on the wikipedia article on Père Lachaise and do not understand why this one would have to be deleted (and not the others). Could you enlighten me? From what I understood it is illegal to post any picture of a Belgian or French landscape on wikipedia? The entry for panorama freedom mentions something on "incidental inclusion" as an exception but does not explain this. --wintermute314 (talk) 10:45, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I assumed Belgium as it says "Made by Bart Van den Bosch, Belgium on April 22, 2006" on the file page. Both France and Belgium do not have FoP - some more info can be seen at commons:COM:FOP. Copyright protection expires 70 years after the death of the original author, so old graves are OK (looks like most of those on the page are >70 years old - unlikly to know the creator, so the date of construction has to do), but this one is dated 4th May 1978 - Only 33 years ago. Also if the memorial stone just had text, then we could use {{PD-text}}, but a picture has been included, which prevents that usage.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:16, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:5000 Lebanese Pounds Reverse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No information given about copyright status of Lebanese currency (which I haven't found), only a claim that photo is under Creative Commons license. —innotata 23:19, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:10000 Lebanese Pounds Obverse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No information given about copyright status of Lebanese currency (which I haven't found), only a claim that photo is under Creative Commons license. —innotata 23:20, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:10000 Lebanese Pounds Reverse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No information given about copyright status of Lebanese currency (which I haven't found), only a claim that photo is under Creative Commons license. —innotata 23:20, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grave-geo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There is no usable FoP provision in the copyright law of the Iran.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:36, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mega-Tv Program.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Obviously a collage of TV screenshots, no reason given why this should be assumed freely licensed Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:47, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.