Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 August 4

< August 3	August 5 >

August 4

Image:C_Catherines_Pic.JPG

Image:C_Catherines_Pic.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jororo (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Permission not specific for GFDL. Nv8200p talk 01:41, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:C_bowers.jpg

Image:C_bowers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Omweb (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The image was being used on the user's page until an anon removed it, citing CSD G11. I'd revert but I'm not sure that act constituted vandalism. Perhaps the edit should be undone and the image unorphaned. -Nard 19:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kept and restored to user page. howcheng {chat} 16:41, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:C._A._Hakeem_Residence.jpg

Image:C._A._Hakeem_Residence.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cameer (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, Watermarked Nv8200p talk 01:46, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Magnetox3.jpg

Image:Magnetox3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alientraveller (notify | contribs).

Non-free copyrighted photograph, unable to determine if it's promotional or not (source link is dead). Should be replaceable by a screenshot, which would be a smaller percentage of a copyrighted work. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 01:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:C320_Profile.jpg

Image:C320_Profile.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kevin Murray (notify | contribs).

Orphaned Nv8200p talk 01:56, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Idfbarnstar.PNG

Image:Idfbarnstar.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eric1985 (notify | contribs).

Wikipedia is not a battleground, ~~image exists to reward tendentious editing~~ — Eleland 02:00, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- How do you draw that conclusion? Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Upon reflection, I don't. Eleland 02:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
keep: now that I know about it, I'll use it for my barnstars. ⇒ SWATJester ^{Denny Crane.} 16:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as relevant as any of dozens of military-related barnstars. Tewfik^Talk 09:24, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. howcheng {chat} 16:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:C400_Aft_Cabin.jpg

Image:C400_Aft_Cabin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kevin Murray (notify | contribs).

Orphan Nv8200p talk 02:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
These photos (including lower XfD's) were orignally included in the article about Catalina Yachts, but some editors bitched about it looking too much like a catalog for the line. I did not protest the removal of the photos from the article. I support whatever choice serves the WP project best, regarding these orphan photos. Cheers! --Kevin Murray 04:00, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Absent uploader, Watermarked Nv8200p talk 02:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CATDRFAK.jpg

Image:CATDRFAK.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Adam levine ian bagg (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, Possible Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 02:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CBBGroup.jpg

Image:CBBGroup.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mrthefrog (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Absent uploader, Possible Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 02:31, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CBM_Wiki_Entry.pdf

Image:CBM_Wiki_Entry.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dcarafel (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, User's only upload Nv8200p talk 02:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CBT2.jpg

Image:CBT2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ThreeDollaBilly (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:35, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CCleanerLogo.jpg

Image:CCleanerLogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SJRansom (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CDB.jpg

Image:CDB.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DRTGuy (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:43, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CERTStation-Dashboard2.jpg

Image:CERTStation-Dashboard2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kalajadu (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CH4mo2.PNG

Image:CH4mo2.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Delldot (notify | contribs).

Orphaned Nv8200p talk 02:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CHOPPED2.jpg

Image:CHOPPED2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xxambersky (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:00, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CIMG044212.JPG

Image:CIMG044212.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chickyfuzz14 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 03:02, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CIMG1608.JPG

Image:CIMG1608.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Darrenburn (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CIMG3704.JPG

Image:CIMG3704.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Klaustrophobik (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, User's only upload Nv8200p talk 03:05, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CL604_Landing_St.Maarten.jpg

Image:CL604_Landing_St.Maarten.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cpthmsimpson (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Appropriate for use on Challenger 600 (added), if we WP:AGF on the stated source / licence status. Jheald 08:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CNV00011.jpeg

Image:CNV00011.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ocani (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:16, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CNZ_RB.JPG

Image:CNZ_RB.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fan Engineer (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:COC6.jpg

Image:COC6.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kingsmen00 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, No encyclopedic context Nv8200p talk 03:18, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:COLORADO_CONT.DIVIDE_01.jpg

Image:COLORADO_CONT.DIVIDE_01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fotomatt1 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CONFERENC_SPEAKER.jpg

Image:CONFERENC_SPEAKER.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sv2146 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 03:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:COTR.JPG

Image:COTR.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Shane52sk (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Low quality, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:23, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:COTR2.jpg

Image:COTR2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Shane52sk (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:23, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Z23.JPG

Image:Z23.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alex clu (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:25, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LOGO.JPG

Image:LOGO.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alex clu (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:HOOPDOWN7.JPG

Image:HOOPDOWN7.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alex clu (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CP.JPG

Image:CP.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alex clu (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CS220-side.jpg

Image:CS220-side.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Coin sorter (notify | contribs).

Orphaned Nv8200p talk 03:31, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CSA-sai.JPG

Image:CSA-sai.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Irishscouter (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Obsoleted by better image Image:Csa-sai.gif -- Jheald 08:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CSMdefinition.JPG

Image:CSMdefinition.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kingsmen00 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 03:36, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CSS_Surf.jpg

Image:CSS_Surf.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aonrotar (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 03:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CSWF_Cruiser_X_Championship.jpg

Image:CSWF_Cruiser_X_Championship.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danny13 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Low quality Nv8200p talk 03:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Keane-We Might as Well Be Strangers.ogg

Image:Keane-We Might as Well Be Strangers.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fluence (notify | contribs).

This is an .ogg file, one of many of Keane's songs, and is under fair use. There are quite a few of keanes songs on the various pages, thus eliminating the rationale that it significantly enhances the encyclopedia: it does not. Also, this has been previously deleted before and the uploader, User:Fluence has threatened on User:ST47's talk page to continue to include this file if it gets deleted again. Further, does not have a fair use rationale for every instance, it only has one single fair use rationale. ⇒ SWATJester ^{Denny Crane.} 03:57, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nom. ⇒ SWATJester ^{Denny Crane.} 04:05, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because it exceeds the 10% rule of Wikipedia:Music samples and Wikipedia:Non-free content#Audio clips. If it were 19 seconds, I would have no objection to keeping it. At this time, tt appears that it does have a rationale for each use. ~ Bigr Tex 16:38, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This latter reason by BigrTex is quite more rational and logical (and true as I knew it was stated) than the nomination itself which relies on a more ambiguous statement so I do support deletion now. However, a comment for Swatjester, 3% from all Keane songs isn't too much. --Fluence 19:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Keane-On a Day Like Today.ogg

Image:Keane-On a Day Like Today.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fluence (notify | contribs).

This is an .ogg file, one of many of Keane's songs, and is under fair use. There are quite a few of keanes songs on the various pages, thus eliminating the rationale that it significantly enhances the encyclopedia: it does not. Also, this has been previously deleted before and the uploader, User:Fluence has threatened on User:ST47's talk page to continue to include this file if it gets deleted again. Further, does not have a fair use rationale for every instance, it only has one single fair use rationale. ⇒ SWATJester ^{Denny Crane.} 03:58, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nom. ⇒ SWATJester ^{Denny Crane.} 04:05, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete. Although is considered to be one of the band's best works, Tom Chaplin (lead singer of Keane) has encouraged the illegal downloading of this particular song (as stated on its FUR) in the United States, as stated on the band's fanzine of 2004 ([1]) due the lack of the track in the album versions for that country. Furthermore, I didn't tell ST47 I would upload these again here.--Fluence 23:29, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just because the artist encourages illegal downloading, does not make the downloading legal. We don't really care what the artist wants or not, fact is, illegal is still illegal. ⇒ SWATJester ^{Denny Crane.} 02:14, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps we should delete one of the other fair use media of this artist and keep this one then? Your deletion rationale is we have too many songs by this artist...maybe this is the one we should keep? -Nard 02:17, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need any of them. Regardless, all of these Keane songs have been speedy deleted at least 4 times. One, I just found, was IFD'd, so I've speedied it as well as a recreation. That many deletions is a pretty good sign that we shouldn't have it. ⇒ SWATJester ^{Denny Crane.} 02:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can assure if this were a Beatles' or Maddona's song then it should be not deleted, but of course if it's from a band less people know then you can do whatever you want with it. The artist can do too whatever they want with their music but the only ones encouraging this thought are actually Muse. I don't think BBC was too happy when they threatened Muse...--Fluence 17:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For one thing WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is not a valid reason to keep. Nobody is "discriminating" on your band's song here. Secondly, you need to firmly understand that just because a band says it is ok to do an admittedly illegal thing, does NOT make it ok to do so. If Keane told you it was ok to beat children with sticks, that does not make it OK to do so. The act is just as much against the law as subverting copyright is. And once again, it's not established for certain whether Keane or their record label holds the rights to make such decisions, even were they legal decisions to make, which they are not. I'm sorry but just because you like it is not good enough.⇒ SWATJester ^{Denny Crane.} 21:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears to me that this sample meets the criteria of Wikipedia:Music samples and Wikipedia:Non-free content#Audio clips, neither of which limits number of samples by artist. I think that at one time there were likely an excessive number of Keane samples, but that implies that we should prune them, not eliminate them altogether. At this time, it appears to have a rationale for each use, since it is only used on one page. ~ Bigr Tex 16:34, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. howcheng {chat} 16:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:StarJonesReynoldsTheView.jpg

Image:StarJonesReynoldsTheView.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by HeyNow10029 (notify | contribs).

Fair use image of living person, replaceable with free use — Ejfetters 04:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC).

Image:TsunamiOsaka2006.jpg

Image:TsunamiOsaka2006.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Van Gyna (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, WP:COI, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsunami Apocalypse (band) Core desat 05:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LooseCannons_Japan06.JPG

Image:LooseCannons_Japan06.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Van Gyna (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, WP:COI, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsunami Apocalypse (band) Core desat 05:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GA_Bio-Filmography.pdf

Image:GA_Bio-Filmography.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Georgeayoub (notify | contribs).

Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader MER-C 05:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Breakinglaces1.jpg

Image:Breakinglaces1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Darbyrob (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breaking Laces Core desat 05:59, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blonde Ambition (Internet Show)

The following images are only used in Blonde Ambition (Internet Show), a deleted article (both article and images submitted by Scootyscoot4:

Mike Rosoft 09:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tree_1.GIF

Image:Tree_1.GIF (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Historydingo (notify | contribs).

Orphaned Unencyclopedic Wikipedia is not myspace MER-C 10:58, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Ian brown 001.jpg

Image:Ian brown 001.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dzstudios (notify | contribs).

Contradictory license information: Tagged as GFDL and cc-by-2.5, but the watermark says "all rights reserved" — High on a tree 12:23, 4 August 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Keep and crop watermark. Dz Studios is free to relicense their work any way they want, and you must first reserve rights before you can give them back. (Standard legalese in other words). -Nard 19:35, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep If they say all rights reserved and then upload it themselves then thats is up to them, what are they going to do sue themselves?

Kept. howcheng {chat} 16:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Israfil2.jpg

Image:Israfil2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Zahakiel (notify | contribs).

Uploader-request; I found a duplicate image on Commons — ◄Zahakiel ► 15:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dorothy_Lemay_Taboo_2.JPG

Image:Dorothy_Lemay_Taboo_2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by CelticJobber (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. Non-free image being used to show what a living person looks like, this image really does not contribute to understanding of the film in question. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 16:03, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:

Image:Hanno_Drechsler.jpeg

Image:Hanno_Drechsler.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Clossius (notify | contribs).

No verifiable source or copyright status. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 16:24, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image is credited (C) Stadt Marburg on this obit, matching the information given by the uploader. [2]. Would appear at the very least to be fair use, so suggest re-tag and keep. Jheald 08:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the tag, added a rationale, and kept. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 23:56, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Hro_1006_039.jpg

Image:Hro_1006_039.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Badluckprince (notify | contribs).

No evidence of release as promotional photograph (no good source information). Replaceable by screenshot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 16:30, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Legolandkevin.jpg

Image:Legolandkevin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ClonedPickle (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not significantly add to readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 16:51, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OEV.jpg

Image:OEV.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ClonedPickle (notify | contribs).

Non-free image being used decoratively - delete per WP:NFCC#8, article contains no commentary on book cover or book. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Image-League of Nations Anachronous Map.PNG

Image:Image-League of Nations Anachronous Map.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sylfide (notify | contribs).

Image duplicated (already exists on Wikipedia:en) - Sylfide 18:01, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Taylor.jpg

Image:Taylor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cdavies 45 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Videmus Omnia ^Talk 18:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rasmus-Sail_away_video.jpg

Image:Rasmus-Sail_away_video.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mathias-90 (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Decorative image. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 19:46, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Appropriate to illustrate the visual style of the video, eg the rather bleak coldness of the beach under a desaturated sky, the plain black styling of the singer, etc. Jheald 06:38, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article goes to some length to describe things that are happening in the video. This screenshot should be replaced by another one that actually depicts something that the article actually states. howcheng {chat} 16:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:14_listenv2_0001.jpg

Image:14_listenv2_0001.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ratizi1 (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 19:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Used commentary as permitted by WP:NFC#Examples of acceptable use: Film and television screen shots:"For critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television." Keep for video commentary only, as videos are discussed and compared in article. --Knulclunk 04:06, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and recommend replacement with a screenshot of some action that is actually described in the article (such as where she removes the excess clothing). howcheng {chat} 17:16, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Beyonce-listenvideo.PNG

Image:Beyonce-listenvideo.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tigermichal (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 19:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Used commentary as permitted by WP:NFC#Examples of acceptable use: Film and television screen shots:"For critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television." Keep for video commentary only, as videos are discussed and compared in article --Knulclunk 04:06, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Should be replaced by a different screenshot where you can see the "1970s-period gown" better, since that's what the article actually describes. howcheng {chat} 16:58, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:198831401_small.jpg

Image:198831401_small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Max24 (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 19:56, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as a section of the article of the single is devoted to the style and substance of the video itself. An image of a video enhances the section. Max24 011:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Aside from the caption, the article doesn't even mention the video. 17Drew 10:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1crazyinlove4.jpg

Image:1crazyinlove4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tigermichal (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 19:57, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:21_Things_I_Want_in_a_Lover_music_video.JPG

Image:21_Things_I_Want_in_a_Lover_music_video.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Extraordinary Machine (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 19:58, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete... but because it's in a Wikipedia:Image use policy-incompliant format for a screenshot (it should be in PNG). The screenshot illustrates the grainy quality of the performance shots in the video — if that was to be described in the article itself, it would be original research. Would it meet the non-free content criteria point linked to above if I added sources describing this graininess (and other aspects of the footage that the screenshot would illustrate in ways text alone could not)? Extraordinary Machine 00:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ABMSvid2.JPG

Image:ABMSvid2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Max24 (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 20:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as a section of the article of the single is devoted to the style and substance of the video itself. An image of a video enhances the section. Max24 011:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is only a short blurb about the video and certainly an image just of her singing is not needed to understand that "a live music video was released". howcheng {chat} 17:18, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ABMphoto3.jpg

Image:ABMphoto3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Max24 (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 20:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as a section of the article of the single is devoted to the style and substance of the video itself. An image of a video enhances the section. Max24 011:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A one-sentence description of the video hardly counts as "critical commentary" on the scene being depicted. howcheng {chat} 17:19, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ADIDAS.JPG

Image:ADIDAS.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Luigi-ish (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 20:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blowin'MeUp.JPG

Image:Blowin'MeUp.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Luigi-ish (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 20:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Used commentary as permitted by WP:NFC#Examples of acceptable use: Film and television screen shots:"For critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television." Keep for video commentary only, delete from individual articles. Shows by example dress and style discussed in text. --Knulclunk 04:15, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Image deleted. There was no commentary or discussion of image. It was a head shot of two people that relayed no significant information. -Nv8200p talk 01:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SomeGirls.JPG

Image:SomeGirls.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Luigi-ish (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 20:33, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Alison_Krauss_Brad_Paisley_Whiskey_Lullaby.jpg

Image:Alison_Krauss_Brad_Paisley_Whiskey_Lullaby.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Staxringold (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 21:02, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep to display the most successful and widespread music video of her entire career. I can't argue about the fair use of the UMass image below, but this is most certainly fair use. Staxringold _talk^contribs 16:34, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Totally unnecessary for reader understanding. No image is required to convey the concept that both Krauss and Paisley appeared in the music video together. howcheng {chat} 17:34, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Alison_Krauss_performs_UMass.JPG

Image:Alison_Krauss_performs_UMass.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Staxringold (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 21:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AMomentLikeThis.jpg

Image:AMomentLikeThis.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ScoobyDoo01 (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 21:07, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ANDHCphoto23.jpg

Image:ANDHCphoto23.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Max24 (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 21:07, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The image very well could illustrate points that words alone could not. But there's not enough in the article for that to be determined. Only one sentence about the video that states the name of the director and the premiere date, not even close to critical commentary. 17Drew 03:38, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as a section of the article of the single is devoted to the style and substance of the video itself. An image of a video enhances the section. Max24 011:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
One sentence is hardly a section. 17Drew 10:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ANewDay-500Show.JPG

Image:ANewDay-500Show.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Max24 (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 21:14, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this article talks about audio/VISUAL show A New Day... An image of a video enhances the article. Max24 011:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The only image you could use for this article is the DVD cover, which doesn't exist yet. The article will have to go sans non-free images until then. This could easily be replaced by a photo of one of her Las Vegas performances. howcheng {chat} 17:37, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ain'tNoOtherManScreen.PNG

Image:Ain'tNoOtherManScreen.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 17Drew (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 21:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please tell me you're not using a bot for IfDs now. I'm not the original uploader and I make no claim to know anything about how the image is being used. You want Bull Borgnine, and I can only assume you're using a bot now since you would have known that had you read the giant banner at the top of my talk page. This is just getting annoying. 17Drew 21:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry - you're the only uploader in the file history - the previous versions were deleted. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 22:02, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - That's why the banner on my talk page says to check the edit history; the original uploader will be there but not in the file history. 17Drew 01:47, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - It's OK to delete it, as long as you tell me the reason why you should (I asume it's because it does not represent the Single (music) in any way). Clarify what's going on here and I will try my best to collaborate. (The warning in my post and my reading of this discussion did not help me undestand in any way). P.S. I've noticed that I'm not the original uploader of this, but I recall uploading the image before. Please, could someone explain to me what's going on? Bull Borgnine 18:28, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep appropriately illustrative of the 1920s styling, and anachronistic rhinestone headphones, discussed in the article. Jheald 09:12, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Used commentary as permitted by WP:NFC#Examples of acceptable use: Film and television screen shots:"For critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television." Keep for video commentary only. --Knulclunk 04:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Image deleted. The image did not provide significant information to the article. Basically a headshot of the artist. -Nv8200p talk 03:45, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Algo_mas.PNG

Image:Algo_mas.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vizcarra (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 21:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Appropriately illustrative of the 1950s styling and black and white film lighting discussed in the article. Jheald 09:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not really. You can barely see the costumes and a picture is not needed to understand that the concept of "black and white". howcheng {chat} 17:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:All5.jpg

Image:All5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Max24 (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 22:01, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as a section of the article of the single is devoted to the style and substance of the video itself. An image of a video enhances the section. Max24 011:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Totally unnecessary for reader comprehension considering as the video isn't even mentioned in the article anywhere but the caption. howcheng {chat} 17:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Always_Be_My_Baby.jpg

Image:Always_Be_My_Baby.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eternal Equinox (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 22:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:American-pie-madonna.JPG

Image:American-pie-madonna.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rsf7589 (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 22:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I've replaced it with Image:AmericanPieVideo.png, which actually illustrates the video unlike useless close-ups, so this one's orphaned now anyway. 17Drew 04:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Amies_Ennemies.JPG

Image:Amies_Ennemies.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Luigi-ish (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 22:36, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Amomvid.JPG

Image:Amomvid.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Thankyoubaby (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 22:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, video commentary. -Thankyoubaby 04:38, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and recommend replacement with a screenshot that shows something actually described in the article (such as the "famous midriff"). howcheng {chat} 17:44, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wim.JPG

Image:Wim.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Thankyoubaby (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 22:46, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, video commentary. -Thankyoubaby 04:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and recommend replacement with a screenshot of something that is actually discussed in the article. howcheng {chat} 17:14, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tdimm2.JPG

Image:Tdimm2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Thankyoubaby (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 22:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Appropriately illustrative of setting, styling, and odd leopard skin outfit, discussed in the article. Jheald 09:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Used commentary as permitted by WP:NFC#Examples of acceptable use: Film and television screen shots:"For critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television." Keep for video commentary only. --Knulclunk 04:20, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, video commentary. -Thankyoubaby 04:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deleted. Discussion of the leopard skin outfit was not significant enough to warrant a fair use image. -Nv8200p talk 03:56, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Anyother1US.jpg

Image:Anyother1US.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tronix (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 23:09, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as a section of the article of the single is devoted to the style and substance of the video itself. An image of a video enhances the section. Max24 11:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is no discussion of the video except to say one was released in the US and a different one was released in Canada. This image is not at all necessary for reader comprehension. howcheng {chat} 17:10, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AnyotherCA.jpg

Image:AnyotherCA.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tronix (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 23:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as a section of the article of the single is devoted to the style and substance of the video itself. An image of a video enhances the section. Max24 11:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is no discussion of the video except to say one was released in the US and a different one was released in Canada. This image is not at all necessary for reader comprehension. howcheng {chat} 17:09, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Asapsophie.jpg

Image:Asapsophie.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Peter2012 (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 23:31, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sophieinsideout.jpg

Image:Sophieinsideout.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Peter2012 (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 23:33, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Asapvideo.jpg

Image:Asapvideo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Peter2012 (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 23:36, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep These templated messages aren't exactly helpful. The article discusses how the video is more "sexier and more confident" than the group's previous work. The screenshot seems to illustrate that pretty well by showing exactly how the video does that. 17Drew 01:50, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The reason i uploaded this was to demonstrate the change in Bardot's image, relevant to that specific part of the article. It shows the group with one less member and more raunchier and confident image. Peter2012 6.19, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. The words "group with one less member and more raunchier and confident image" convey the same encyclopedic information as the image. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 14:34, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The image shows how the group presented "a raunchier and more confident image" -- ie exactly what that image was. There are innumerable different ways in which the group might have presented "a raunchier and more confident image". But this image shows exactly how they did, thus appropriately illustrating and clarifying the text. Jheald 09:27, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Used commentary as permitted by WP:NFC#Examples of acceptable use: Film and television screen shots:"For critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television." Keep for video commentary only. --Knulclunk 04:17, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the "raunchier and more confident" image is already being displayed in the album cover. howcheng {chat} 17:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Image kept. The image clarifies what "new and confident" image means. -Nv8200p talk 03:41, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Visage_band.jpg

Image:Visage_band.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Enigmaticland (notify | contribs).

Unknown source or copyright holder. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 23:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. User has given his best information on the source, which is what NFCC #10. The relevance of this is for us to assess the legal fair use position. Image is either a publicity photo, or (worst case) a photo taken for a contemporary magazine. Either way there is no suggestion of an NFCC #2 problem, which is what the source information is relevant to assess. Regarding NFCC #8 (significance), the look of the band (especially Steve Strange) was an important part of its distinctiveness, and the photo makes a valuable contribution to the reader's understanding of this. Jheald 09:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, in the worst case (photo taken for a contemporary magazine), then we would indeed have a NFCC #2 problem. Thus, delete for not knowing the actual source. howcheng {chat} 17:06, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ashleeboyfriend.png

Image:Ashleeboyfriend.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kahlen (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 23:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:KissTheGirl031.jpg

Image:KissTheGirl031.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pkm evo (notify | contribs).

Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 23:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]