Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaser Birjas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:56, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yaser Birjas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject appears to fall below the relevant notability guidelines. There is some material written about him on blogs and discussion forums, as well as in self-published books lacking editorial oversight and Wikipedia mirrors. None of these are reliable sources. There are a few reliable sources mentioning the subject in passing for some obscure situations such as him leading the funeral prayer for the victims of Hasib GhulamRabbi. However, I don't see this as being sufficient per WP:GNG. Also, the subject fails both criteria for WP:ANYBIO. Saheeh Info 20:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 20:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 20:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Notability not demonstrated. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. --HyperGaruda (talk) 09:20, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:56, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:12, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, borderline A7 speedy. Article contains no suggestion nor evidence of notability via WP:PROF, WP:GNG, nor any other criterion. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:20, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per David Eppstein, a borderline CSD A7 case, nothing to indicate passing of any of the relevant notability guidelines. Nsk92 (talk) 22:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.