Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WaterRace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 20:21, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WaterRace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable game, website links dont work (even though it says archive) and the only proof i could find of it's existence is https://github.com/swisspol/WaterRace. Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 23:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 23:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The references do work when inputted into the Wayback Machine, so technically it would only need one more reference to pass WP:GNG._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:30, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: in addition to the reviews already listed in the article, there's magazine coverage including reviews that can be found on Archive.org.--Alexandra^IDV 10:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I think that the review from MacWorld magazine found by Alexandra seals the deal that this page is notable, per WP:NEXIST it should remain._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• I can't get any of the links in the article to work and can't see an actual review from the link provided above. Can anyone provide links to the reviews in question? Hobit (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Hobit: I don't know if you mean that Archive.org is having trouble loading (which may happen at times due to maintenance), but here are the specific links: MacWorld review, A Vos Mac feature, A Vos Mac feature, A Vos Mac feature about development, Inside Mac Games review, Mac OS Journal review--Alexandra^IDV 09:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    I was able to access some of these. Yes, it's probably enough for a keep, good rescue! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    • Things seemed a bit of a vague wave. Again, the sources in the article all appear to no longer exist, so it would be ideal if those were updated. Hobit (talk) 19:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Notable. Agree that review from MacWorld magazine found by Alexandra seals the deal per WP:NEXIST. - Ret.Prof (talk) 18:01, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, as there are enough reviews to show notability.Jackattack1597 (talk) 19:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.