Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang-Ching Liu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:10, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wang-Ching Liu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. Awards are vanity awards pay-to-win. Unable to find independent book reviews in reliable sources. NAN-PAT-VIC PUBLISHING is the authors own publishing company self published. Green Cardamom (talk) 19:11, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:49, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:15, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete two of the awards appear to be fairly legitimate, but she was only a finalist for one. Not seeing any evidence that she or her books have been covered in reliable independent sources.Candleabracadabra (talk) 21:56, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious which of the awards look legitimate. You may be right, when I looked they all seemed to have the classic vanity characteristics. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 01:04, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further investigation the "awards" appear to be paid marketing. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.