Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Doldersum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. No !votes aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) clpo13_(talk) 16:48, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Todd Doldersum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable and improvable and also speedy and PROD material as my searches simply found nothing at all and it simply seems he's best known for Big & Small. It's worth noting the original author was removed of his editing capabilities exactly one day later or else I would've tagged this as G5. SwisterTwister talk 07:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:41, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:41, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:41, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I'm curious why you brought this to AfD if you think it's 'speedy and PROD material'. I certainly don't think it's speedy material, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of coverage around. I did find this. --Michig (talk) 19:06, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.