Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The One Above All (Marvel Comics)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 13:27, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The One Above All (Marvel Comics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As it was already discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One-Above-All, this is mere original research: there is no such a character, but several metafictional references to God (the "real" God) included in comics by Marvel, which can only be considered as references to a same "character" with a great deal of imagination and fan wishful thinking. This is not the same article (and so, speedy deletion is not an option), but it is the same original research, using even less references and more all-plot than the previous one. Cambalachero (talk) 13:08, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A 'character' that isn't even particularly notable within Marvel Comics, and the article is very poorly sourced and makes no real claims at any notability. Not a likely search term, so no redirect is needed. kuwabaratheman (talk) 15:48, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This 'character' has never actually appeared in a comic. This doesn't even deserve an entry on the List of Marvel Comics Characters. At best, it might warrant a mention on the Living Tribunal's page. Argento Surfer (talk) 15:54, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Calling this a 'character' is an insult to actual characters, because the writers involved have never intended them to be considered the same. I would even disagree with Surfer and say this doesn't warrant a mention on the Living Tribunal's page. This is a list of unsourced fancruft. I don't even understand why it hasn't been deleted already. Spidey104 14:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This doesn't even seem to be a single coherent subject, much less one that meets notability standards.--NukeofEarl (talk) 19:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.