Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tesla Bot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:40, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla Bot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tesla Bot fails WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NOTNEWS. The bot was 'announced' yesterday. There is no way of knowing what the notability will be; so far it's just a tool for media attention. All of the specs are just speculation at this point. As mentioned in the article it's anyone's guess as to whether a working Tesla Bot will ever see the light of day.^[1] Mikalagrand (talk) 15:39, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are plenty of news articles about the conceptual product (e.g. https://www.google.com/search?tbm=nws&q=%22Tesla+Bot%22+-wikipedia) which meets the Notability standard. QRep2020 (talk) 15:58, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am invoking Wikipedia:Snowball_clause as there is already an overwhelming rough consensus to keep and frankly the argument for the AfD was not a terribly good one to begin with given the number of reliable independent third-party articles about the subject. QRep2020 (talk) 02:50, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is all other news. Even if Tesla fails to produce it at all, it is already written in history. --Igor Yalovecky (talk) 16:07, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Washington Post, CNBC, The Verge, Bloomberg and Techcrunch wrote about it, so it is notable even if "it's just a tool for media attention". Artem.G (talk) 18:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As per above Coldbolt (talk) 17:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Even if it will never come out, it already gained significant media coverage by many reliable sources.-- Maxeto0910 (talk) 18:42, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Obviously. X-Editor (talk) 01:57, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:44, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:44, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.