Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STEFDIES

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:50, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

STEFDIES

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Artist who made 123 instagram posts and "went viral" for posting "hilarious" "anti-selfies". The article has a lot of citations, but when you read them, you'll see they all say essentially the same thing. Coverage in clickbait posts is in significant indepth coverage in independent, reliable sources. Vexations (talk) 11:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 11:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 11:50, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete we need consistent sustained coverage, rather than flash-in-the-pan viral phenomena. --- Possibly ☎ 19:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Trivial coverage that is not enough to pass WP:NARTIST. I think the nom meant to write "insignificant", not "in significant". Netherzone (talk) 21:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete.Per above.---✨Lazy Maniik✨ 12:20, 26 October 2021 (UTC) Sockpuppet of blocked user Vivek ji123. ✗plicit 13:49, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.