Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberto Molinelli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Please add newly found sources to the article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:57, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Roberto Molinelli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is sourced to the subject's website, YouTube, and other sources like press releases which lack independence from the subject. Not clear that the subject passes WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. 4meter4 (talk) 00:16, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Italy. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, seems to be notable as a composer/musician/conductor, I think something like WP:MUSICBIO, WP:COMPOSER, WP:NCREATIVE should be satisfied, possibly WP:BASIC. It's likely most of the coverage will not be in English language here.
  1. There's quite a bit of SIGCOV of his music direction for in this German De Gruyter book Die Interaktion zwischen Dirigent:in und Musiker:innen in Orchesterproben: [1]
  2. WP:COMPOSER / WP:MUSICBIO for various pieces including
     1. "Lady Walton's Garden" [2][3]
     2. Tango Seasons [4][5]

Not sure on how independent this is, but there's a bio credited to a Cecilia Farinelli in the Barilla historical archive (yes that Barilla) [6], also seems to be in one or more books put out by that company [7]

—siroχo 08:29, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:19, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep sources above seem ok, I'd incorporate them into the article. Oaktree b (talk) 13:29, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.