Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riley Shy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 07:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Riley Shy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:PORNBIO and the GNG. All awards/noms are scene related. All GNews and GBooks hits are spurious or trivial. No reliably sourced biographical content. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:33, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Insufficient coverage in reliable sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 21:53, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:30, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Seems to fail WP:PORNBIO. --Cerebellum (talk) 01:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails GNG and PORNBIO as the nominator states. My own search for non-trivial reliable source coverage yielded only a brief mention in an AVN article that looks very much like a press release. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.