Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Carpet Diary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  18:00, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Red Carpet Diary

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a promotional web series, not referenced to adequate reliable source coverage to clear WP:GNG or WP:NMEDIA. Of the four footnotes here, two are deadlinked primary source directories of its own self-published web presence, and one is a deadlinked blog entry -- and the only live source is a press release from a media outlet announcing that it was going to start carrying this, so even that is a directly affiliated source and not an independent third-party source. So this isn't automatically entitled to have a standalone article just because it existed, but the sourcing here isn't getting it anywhere near a GNG pass. To the extent that we need any content about this at all, one or two sentences in Toronto International Film Festival would completely cover off what little we can properly source — and I'm not convinced we even need that much. Bearcat (talk) 03:07, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:32, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:53, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:53, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:53, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Train^talk 06:47, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:04, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable junket footage/video ad thing. Nate • (chatter) 01:46, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- no indications of notability or significance; notability is not inherited from the festival that it serves as a "entertainment news feature". K.e.coffman (talk) 04:49, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't pass WP:GNG, WP:NFO or the most applicable aspects of WP:NMEDIA. Shearonink (talk) 15:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.