Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pooja Solanki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:01, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pooja Solanki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actress that has only acted in one film. Not much sources about her. Right now, WP: Too soon. TamilMirchi (talk) 22:41, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 22:41, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 22:41, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails WP:NACTOR, too soon Spiderone 07:14, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Don't Delete - She is the lead actress in the film Edaina Jaragocchu so of course she doesn't fail WP: NACTOR and she has also more than 420K followers on Instagram. She is a professional actress and she should have an WP: Article Call Me Anshu 12:15, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One role does not mean an automatic pass for NACTOR; in fact, it clearly states "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." which is clearly not the case for this person. 420k followers is quite a lot on Instagram but there's no notability policy based on Insta followers Spiderone 14:54, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete one role is never enough to create notability. If she has more roles in the future we can recreate the article when there is actual coverage and roles to justify it, they do not exist at present.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:03, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't Delete She is the lead actress in a notable movie. She also has enough media coverages. She deserves this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:8100:24D8:D824:7E70:C5C2:DE74:26C4 (talk) 21:51, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The rationale for don't delete above is the same as this one. Are you a sockpuppet? You only have 2 edits.TamilMirchi (talk) 17:19, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is clearly a case of TOSOON. As she lacks multiple in-depth reliable sources about her. Also, it's pretty likely one or both of the keep votes are sockpuppets. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.