Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Phud

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dab page contains three obscure slang terms and one person with this given name. I don't think there's a justification for a dab page here. Hog Farm _Bacon 22:40, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 22:40, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the purpose of a disambiguation page is not to list every possible usage of a term (WP:NOTDICT), it is to help users navigate between different Wikipedia articles with the same name. Since there is only one article with this name, the page serves no navigational purpose. Spicy (talk) 23:02, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, same reasoning as Spicy. Schazjmd (talk) 00:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've heard "phud" used for Ph.D. on a number of occasions (I have this qualification myself), also referring to a senile professor. The term may be more common in the UK. I have to admit the vagina definition is new to me, however, that and the person with the name "Phud" are only added for completeness. I'd argue I found the term on other websites (I'll add links if you wish), the term does exist and this justifies inclusion. New words appear all the time, circulating in use before becoming mainstream and this is just such an example. Do we remove "Mackem" because it's not commonly heard of outside the UK?Beefy_SAFC
Okay, so what changes do you want me to make to have it kept?
I'll point out I had a page on a village called "Matho" in Northern India deleted due to someone saying it was rubbish, even though I'd included a photo of said place. This is not going to into a repeat of that, an instance where I ended up being able to restore the page three months later?Beefy_SAFC —Preceding undated comment added 09:59, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per aboveMajun e Baqi (talk) 10:52, 13 July 2020 (UTC) Striking Sock !vote -- Dane ^talk 04:15, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The existence of this spurious disambiguation page inhibits the use of Search. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:23, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above. Nika2020 (talk) 18:05, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devokewater (talk) 19:29, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Spicy ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 05:16, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTDICT. Useless Dab. -- Dane ^talk 04:14, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per current policy. ——Serial 16:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.