Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Papakomeka Lake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:57, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Papakomeka Lake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unreferenced article about a small lake, whose only evident claim of notability under WP:GEOLAND is that it exists. Every lake on earth is not automatically presumed notable just because it exists, however -- GEOLAND states that the notability of a lake is conditional on the ability to provide information beyond just statistics and coordinates alone, but there's no evidence of that here. Bearcat (talk) 02:28, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 02:30, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Even this tourist guide doesn't say much about it. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails geoland. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 19:50, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.