Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oh Geeez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:25, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Geeez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not yet notable per WP:BAND. This has bounced back and forth to draft in at least three copies that I can see, where it was declined twice for notability and poor sourcing. It would probably qualify for speedy db-band if not for the Animation World Network reference, but that's quite short, and I can't find significant coverage in reliable sources in a WP:BEFORE search, just routine local coverage. Wikishovel (talk) 10:20, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Wisconsin. Wikishovel (talk) 10:20, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:59, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:27, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Soft-deletion is unlikely to stick here given history of the article, so final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 20:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – I'm not seeing significant coverage anywhere that would make this pass WP:BAND. I also am unable to find anything additional for sourcing. Tollens (talk) 07:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails to demonstrate notability, and I was also unable to find significant coverage in my quick search of the usual spots. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:17, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.