Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Tenerelli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Tenerelli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable contestant who insists they "deserve a profile". Delete and salt. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:09, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I deserve a wikipedia page since I was 3rd on my season and that is higher finish than Grant Mattos, Mike Chosl, Matthew Elrod, Ashley Underwood, and Andrea Boehlke who each have one, so I deserve one too. I also be on a reality show other than Surivor which none of those ever have, even if Andrea was back on Survivor, but again not making finals like I make. And I worked for Los Angeles Clippers franchise as a dancer. So all around my body is work and famous and more deserving than the other top finishers of my season but not me have one too, not fair . I also really was 2nd since I would have crushed Phillip who came 2nd in a jury vote, all 8 who voted Rob were voting me over Phillip, or anyone else had they made the end. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natalieten (talk • contribs) 20:30, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restore redirect and maybe protect it, which seems like the more logical option here. SkyWarrior 20:33, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is more to life than having a Wikipedia page. I note [1] for the page creator's benefit, and Template talk:Survivor (U.S. TV series) contestants for the benefit of other reviewers. Power~enwiki (talk) 20:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Subject may have sufficient coverage from independent reliable sources to meet the simplest WP standards for notability... A quick google search turns up [2], [3]. Also article reads self-promotional. The bit at the end about being good friends with other contestants - why is that there? IMHO needs to be re-written and referenced with enough independent RS to satisfy WP standards for notability. Cllgbksr (talk) 04:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:26, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:26, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The tone of both the article and the author presents a strong possibility that this is merely the work of a troll. The subject in question may be deserving of an article, but let someone who's actually serious about giving her one write it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.239.128.232 (talk) 15:47, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is nothing noteable about this individual enough to warrant a wikipedia page. If being a 1 time goat on one of the worst seasons of Survivor alone was enough than Sherri Biethmann and Albert Destrade would have wikipedia pages, and they dont. Ryanlochteboy (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:49, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This individual just isnt relevant enough to merit a page, sorry. On a Survivor site I go on we are all laughing someone actually tried to make a wikipedia page for her. That about sums it up. The page says it all too, like 2 lines of info, that is all one can muster on the obscure subject. User:ConwayMarty 22:35, 18 May 2017 (EST)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.